MIT vs GPL: The Ultimate Comparison
Understand the fundamental differences between permissive and copyleft licenses
Expert resources to navigate open source licensing with confidence
Understand the fundamental differences between permissive and copyleft licenses
Which licenses allow you to build commercial products without legal headaches
Protect your proprietary code from unintended open-sourcing
Yes! MIT is one of the most permissive licenses. You can use, modify, and distribute MIT licensed code in commercial products without paying royalties or open-sourcing your code.
If you distribute software containing GPL code, you must release your entire codebase under GPL. This is why GPL is called a "viral" license - it spreads to all linked code.
No, Apache 2.0 is incompatible with GPL v2 due to patent termination clauses. However, it IS compatible with GPL v3, which was updated to address this issue.
LGPL (Lesser GPL) allows proprietary software to link to LGPL libraries without becoming open source, as long as the linking is dynamic. GPL requires the entire work to be GPL.
Stop guessing about license compatibility. Get instant, accurate analysis of your dependencies.